Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. //--> But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. b. I regret giving them his address. The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal?
Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev Thanks! Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). Asked by megha m HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? b. In which case does PLOS ONE use a third reviewer?
editor decision started nature rejection - bobmarleypeace.com if you strongly disagree with the editorial decision, you can appeal against it unless the editor has clearly specified otherwise. At some point, they may come back to you and ask you to suggest names (additional names, if you had already given some when you originally submitted the paper). This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. 2002 Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. All Rights Reserved. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Yes, its appropriate. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. . [CDATA[// >How to Appeal a Journal Decision - Elsevier Author Services Blog Because it was sitting in my barn / shop for over 12 years!! The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the .
Decision turnaround times - Nature Portfolio Bioengineering Community Hi! If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors.